Sunday, 22 March 2015

Regretting A Fact

He regretted (the fact) that he had lied.


He
regretted
(the fact) [[that he had lied]]
Senser
Process: mental: emotive
Phenomenon: metaphenomenon


Halliday & Matthiessen (2004: 471):
A fact clause serving as Head in a nominal group without a fact noun can be related to the first class of fact noun — that of 'cases', since such a fact clause is always agnate with an expanded nominal group with fact as Head.  Whether the nominal group has a fact noun as Head or not, the fact clause is embedded.  Because there is no projecting process involved, to which it could be paratactically or hypotactically related, a fact can appear only in embedded form: either as Qualifier to a 'fact' noun, or as a nominalisation on its own.

the
fact
[[that he had lied]]
Deictic
Thing
Qualifier

vs

[[that he had lied]]
Qualifier/Head

Saturday, 21 March 2015

Hot Lover Boy

Did he tell you his real name or that he was called Hot Lover Boy?

Did
he
tell
you
his real name
or
(did)
(he)
(tell)
(you)
that
he
was called
Hot Lover Boy
1
+ 2






a
“ b
Process:
Sayer
verbal
Receiver
Verbiage

Process:
Sayer
verbal
Receiver

Value/
Identified
Process: relational
Token/
Identifier

This analysis recovers the information that is understood by both speaker and addressee, 
but which is so Given in such discourse, it can be left unsaid.

Tuesday, 17 March 2015

Forbearers


At these moments
America
has carried on
not simply because of the skill or vision of those in high office
but
because
We the People
have remained
faithful to the ideals of our forbearers*, and true to our founding documents
a

x b cause: reason
Location
Actor
Process: material
Cause: reason


Carrier
Process: relational
Attribute
Adjunct
Subject
Finite/Predicator
Adjunct


Subject
Finite/Predicator
Complement
Theme: marked
Rheme
Theme
Rheme


Reasoning:

The 'but' relates to 'not simply' and anticipates a second prepositional phrase related by paratactic extension in a phrase complex realising a circumstance of Cause: reason.*  However, the writer has instead opted for an enhancing dependent clause of Cause: reason, thereby creating a logical inconsistency.

The hypotactic relation between the clauses can be made more apparent by removing the preceding circumstance of Cause: reason (which also removes the need for 'but'):



At these moments
America
has carried on
because
We the People
have remained
faithful to the ideals of our forbearers, and true to our founding documents
a
x b cause: reason
Location
Actor
Process: material

Carrier
Process: relational
Attribute
Adjunct
Subject
Finite/Predicator

Subject
Finite/Predicator
Complement
Theme: marked
Rheme
Theme
Rheme



* An extending paratactic prepositional phrase complex such as:

not simply because of the skill or vision of those in high office,

but because of the fact that We the People have remained faithful to the ideals of our forbearers, and true to our founding documents 

not simply
because of
the skill or vision [of those in high office]
but
because of
the fact [[that We the People have remained faithful to the ideals of our forbearers, and true to our founding documents]]
1
+ 2

Process
Range

Process
Range


forbear

verb: politely or patiently restrain an impulse to do something; refrain.
"he modestly forbears to include his own work"

synonyms: refrain, abstain, desist, keep, restrain oneself, stop oneself, hold back,withhold


Given that the writer screwed up on the lexis, it's hardly surprising they screwed up on the grammar as well, by trying to set up a logico-semantic relation between a prepositional phrase and a clause.

The theory accounts for an instance like this the same way it accounts for instances like he done real good.

On the mismatch between potential and instance, see here.