It 
 | 
is 
 | 
John 
 | 
that 
 | 
I 
 | 
love 
 | 
Theme 
 | 
Rheme 
 | 
Theme 
 | 
Rheme 
 | ||
Theme 
 | 
Rheme 
 | ||||
New 
 | 
Given 
 | ||||
Sub- 
 | 
Finite 
 | 
Complement 
 | 
-ject 
 | ||
Val- 
 | 
Process 
 | 
Token/Identifier 
 | 
-ue/Identified 
 | ||
Head/Thing 
 | 
Postmodifier/Qualifier 
 | ||||
For the textual and interpersonal analyses, see Halliday & Matthiessen (2004: 97, 157).
For the experiential analysis, the reasoning is as follows:
- for Token-Value structure, compare the agnate clause: John represents the one that I love where John functions as (the less abstract) Token (see Halliday & Matthiessen 2004: 231);
 - for Identifier-Identified structure, consider the probe: Which represents the one that I love?; that is, the one that I love is identified by John, so John functions as the Identifier (see Halliday & Matthiessen 2004: 228). Also, in the unmarked case, the Identifier conflates with the New information, as it does here (Halliday & Matthiessen 2004: 229).
 
No comments:
Post a Comment