Any allegations of nonconsensual sex
|
are
|
unequivocally
|
denied
|
by Mr. Weinstein
|
Theme
|
Rheme
|
|||
New
|
Given
|
|||
Subject
|
Finite
|
mood Adjunct: intensity: degree: total
|
Predicator
|
Adjunct
|
Mood
|
Residue
|
In this analysis, the tonic prominence is assumed to fall on unequivocally, thereby textually highlighting the interpersonal intensity as the marked Focus of New information.
cf Geoff Pullum:
But it’s a key fact about passives in English that you don’t put older information in the by-phrase when there’s newer information in the subject. … Here that information-structure constraint is oddly violated by putting Mr. Weinstein in the by-phrase.
On clauses, like the above, that are marked for both voice and information, Halliday & Matthiessen (2014: 282) write:
The reason for choosing the ‘receptive’ in English is to get the desired texture, in terms of Theme-Rheme and Given-New; in particular, it avoids marked information focus (which carries an additional semantic feature of contrast). Here, however, the ‘receptive’ has the opposite effect; it actually leads to a marked focus of information (New before Given); hence the resulting form is doubly marked, both for information and for voice. Such a form is by no means impossible; but the meaning is such that it assumes a highly specific context.
No comments:
Post a Comment